Disponible en streaming sur Youtube, ce film traite de «drone».

Découvrez une production de Jeremy Corbell consacrée à « drone ».

Regardez cette vidéo diffusée sur Youtube par Jeremy Corbell.
à propos de « drone »:

Nous avons découvert cette vidéo récemment et elle bénéficiait d’une belle interaction. Le compteur de Likes indiquait: 5665.

La vidéo dure 00:42:22 secondes et porte le titre Europe’s Skies Hijacked by Shadow Drones : WEAPONIZED : EP #93, fournis par l’auteur. La description détaillée est la suivante :« Il y a près d’un an, de mystérieux drones d’origine inconnue ont commencé à bourdonner sur des bases militaires et d’autres sites sensibles, principalement dans l’est des États-Unis. Ils sont apparus de nulle part, ont plané et manœuvré au-dessus des aérodromes, n’ont pas essayé de cacher leur présence et n’ont pas pu être suivis lorsqu’ils sont partis brusquement. Des bases américaines entières ont été fermées, notamment Langley et Wright-Patterson AFB. Des incursions similaires ont été signalées dans des bases communes au Royaume-Uni, où le personnel a déployé une technologie anti-drone avancée – sans effet. Aujourd’hui, plusieurs pays européens connaissent des incursions tout aussi troublantes. Ces dernières semaines, de mystérieux drones ont semé la peur et la confusion en Norvège, en Suède, au Danemark, en Allemagne et en Belgique. Les gouvernements soupçonnent que les drones sont contrôlés par la Russie, même s’il n’existe aucune preuve pour le prouver, et ces drones ne peuvent pas être suivis ou abattus. Dans cet épisode de WEAPONIZED, Jeremy et George sont rejoints par le journaliste britannique Chris Sharp, rédacteur en chef et fondateur du Liberation Times, dont la couverture perspicace des mystérieux drones au cours de l’année écoulée est parmi les meilleures au monde. Chris partage de nouvelles informations sur les incursions les plus récentes, a un aperçu des tentatives de suivi et de neutralisation des mystérieux drones et spécule sur les raisons pour lesquelles les invasions de drones pourraient être une réponse mesurée des forces terrestres, une récompense pour quelque chose qui a été initié par les alliés de l’OTAN. Également dans cet épisode, des informations supplémentaires sur un gigantesque triangle noir aperçu en vol stationnaire au-dessus d’une piste de la base aérienne d’Eglin, comme décrit par un témoin oculaire dans un épisode précédent. Consultez la publication de Chris Sharp https://LiberationTimes.com VOUS AVEZ UN CONSEIL ? Contactez-nous à WeaponizedPodcast@Proton.me ••• Dans WEAPONIZED, Jeremy Corbell et George Knapp lèvent le voile sur le monde du connu pour explorer l’inexpliqué. Cette série d’enquête multiplateforme présente des interviews exclusives, des images inédites, des documents précédemment supprimés, des enregistrements audio et vidéo originaux et des preuves concrètes liées aux ovnis, au paranormal, à la science de pointe, aux dissimulations, aux complots et aux crimes majeurs. Des conversations originales et révolutionnaires avec des lanceurs d’alerte du gouvernement, des espions, des espions, des scientifiques, des responsables militaires, des journalistes dégueulasses, des cinéastes, des historiens, des artistes, des musiciens et des célébrités majeures projetteront une large ombre sur l’autre monde… et détailleront les expériences humaines qui informent ces phénomènes extraordinaires. Votre curiosité sera ARMÉE. ••• SUIVEZ : Pour les dernières nouvelles, suivez Corbell & Knapp sur tous les réseaux sociaux. ÉCOUTEZ : Cliquez ici et vous serez dirigé vers votre plateforme PODCAST audio uniquement préférée https://link.chtbl.com/Weaponized APPRENDRE : Des extras et des bonus des épisodes peuvent être trouvés sur https://WeaponizedPodcast.com ••• JEREMY CORBELL est un artiste contemporain américain et cinéaste d’investigation avec des films sur Netflix et Hulu. Il est connu pour son travail documentaire explorant les mystères des domaines des ovnis, des technologies avancées et de « l’espace sombre » où la science affronte l’anormal. Les films de Corbell révèlent comment les idées défendues par des individus crédibles peuvent modifier la façon dont nous vivons la réalité et nous aider à reconsidérer le tissu de nos propres croyances. SUIVEZ JEREMY SUR LES SOCIAUX https://x.com/JeremyCorbell https://Instagram.com/JeremyCorbell https://Facebook.com/JeremyCorbell SITE WEB DE JEREMY https://ExtraordinaryBeliefs.com ••• GEORGE KNAPP est un journaliste d’investigation dont le travail a été récompensé par les Edward R Murrow Awards, DuPont, Peabody Awards et 28 Regional Emmy Awards. Il est le journaliste d’investigation en chef de KLAS TV (CBS) et un animateur régulier de l’émission de radio souscrite Coast to Coast AM. Ses nombreuses exclusivités incluent ses reportages sur l’histoire de Bob Lazar, la couverture publique de la zone 51 et du Skinwalker Ranch. SUIVEZ GEORGE SUR LES SOCIAUX https://x.com/G_Knapp https://Instagram.com/GeorgeKnapp66 https://Facebook.com/George.Knapp.125 SITE WEB DE GEORGE https://MysteryWire.com ••• *Production de Michael Lazovsky https://MichaelLazovsky.com ».

Avec son immense catalogue de vidéos, Youtube donne aux utilisateurs la possibilité d’explorer des contenus originaux et enrichissants tout en respectant leur confidentialité.

Solutions Aériennes Professionnelles : Une Entreprise de Drone

Les drones professionnels ont modifié en profondeur plusieurs secteurs en France. Que l’on parle de suivi agricole, d’inspection de bâtiments ou de relevés topographiques, ces technologies offrent des points de vue inédits avec une précision et une efficacité renforcées. Recourir à une entreprise de drone est devenu une nécessité pour satisfaire les besoins des particuliers, des collectivités et des entreprises.

Un drone professionnel peut, grâce aux innovations technologiques, réaliser des missions diverses avec une grande exactitude. Il est destiné à l’inspection de bâtiments, à la surveillance de chantiers, à la cartographie de terrains et à la réalisation de films et productions audiovisuelles. Assurer un travail de qualité nécessite de recourir à des pilotes formés et certifiés par la DGAC.

La sécurité des inspections techniques est assurée grâce à un drone. Cet outil est utilisé pour examiner l’état des infrastructures, identifier d’éventuels défauts et optimiser la gestion des risques. Les images aériennes offrent des vidéos et photos en haute définition, idéales pour des projets de communication, le tournage de films ou le suivi de chantiers. La cartographie et la modélisation permettent de générer des modèles 3D de bâtiments et d’effectuer des relevés topographiques précis.

Obtenir une certification de la DGAC est indispensable pour travailler en tant que pilote de drone professionnel. Il est nécessaire que la formation inclue le respect des protocoles de sécurité, la gestion des vols en zones spécifiques et la maîtrise des réglementations. Ces compétences sont essentielles pour assurer des missions conformes à la législation et pour satisfaire les exigences des clients.

SupraDrone se positionne comme un prestataire français dans le secteur des services de drone professionnel. Dans diverses régions et départements en France, il gère toutes les démarches administratives liées aux vols de drones. En étroite collaboration avec la DGAC, les services des préfectures et les mairies, les autorisations sont traitées par SupraDrone et la conformité réglementaire est vérifiée avant chaque mission.

Une fois les démarches complétées, SupraDrone fait appel à ses opérateurs de drone locaux pour fournir des services personnalisés selon les attentes des clients. Chaque projet, qu’il soit une production audiovisuelle, une inspection technique ou une mission de cartographie, est géré par un pilote qualifié. Grâce à cette structure, l’entreprise s’assure d’une intervention rapide et efficace, tout en proposant un accompagnement personnalisé dans chaque région. En associant savoir-faire technique et gestion optimisée, SupraDrone se fait une place de choix dans le domaine du drone professionnel en France.

Avec un siège à Paris, à proximité des services de l’État et de la DGAC, SupraDrone prend en charge toutes les démarches administratives liées aux missions de drone. Son réseau de télépilotes répartis en régions permet d’assurer des interventions en moins de 24 heures. Cliquez ici

Pour visionner la vidéo, cliquez ici pour accéder à youtube :
la publication originale: Cliquer ici

#Europes #Skies #Hijacked #Shadow #Drones #WEAPONIZED

Retranscription des paroles de la vidéo: four airports in Denmark last night when drones appeared in their airspace. Flights were grounded. It’s extraordinary um to see how many headlines these incidents have actually generated and going to Copenhagen airport and there being special forces and police present at the scene. You’d assume it’s Russians that doing that stuff. And so the assumption is made all these other European countries that are have drones flying over must be Russians. And yet, you know, we see the Russians are stretched pretty thin. They’re using drones in um in Ukraine and they can’t seem to buy them and make them fast enough. They’re getting them from all over the world. And those drones don’t seem to be doing what these drones are doing. They did whip out the most advanced anti- drone technology we have and it had no effect. Correct. Yeah. Yeah. That that that’s very very accurate. We got word from reliable sources that there was footage of a pyramidshaped object lifting up out of the bay and hovering and loitering over this critical infrastructure. This is weaponized. [Music] This is weaponized. I’m George Knap hanging out in temperate and beautiful Las Vegas, Nevada. Uh, I’m telling you, October is the nicest time of the year to be here. I am joined by my friend and colleague, Jeremy Corbel, who is keeping a low profile somewhere on the West Coast. Jeremy, how’s it going? Pretty good, man. Yeah, just hiding out, trying not to um talk too much. I’m trying to listen more. I see that you listen to my suggested dress code, right? Yeah. Yeah. Suit and tie. That’s right. As always, we got a lot to cover today. We’re going to go uh check in with our friend Christopher Sharp talk about drona palooa. But first uh want to revisit something that we touched on last week at great interview with your friend Daniel about something that was seen gigantic triangle hovering right over a runway at Eglund Air Force Base. You have an update on that? Yeah, just um you know look, Daniel was a great witness. He went through the entire process of vetting with Congress and he has a very small experience in that he just saw something. But it gave me a lot of hope because if what he saw is something we were operating then maybe we do have some control over this um really extraordinary technology. I don’t know what to make of it, but I thought bringing him out on weaponized was important because he didn’t testify to Congress and it wasn’t like he was waiting to come out on weaponized. He literally couldn’t do it that the weekend Congress had him. He he was willing to do it. He couldn’t do it. He was uh I don’t know give away too much but it was a it was a very positive thing in his life um that he was doing on that on on that time period. So I just thought let’s bring him out. Now what’s happened since then since then is that people have come and said we also saw this extraordinary technology camp rudder Eglund Air Force Base. They’re not willing to go on record at this time. And you know, I’m trying. Yes, I’m trying to get them to come forward. So, it was just kind of neat to hear a little bit more about people that have seen this extraordinary triangular shaped technology that doesn’t seem to lift with air displacement or jets or anything like that. Now, I don’t know. I don’t have anything else to report on that other than I think I’ve been able to with Daniel to identify exactly where he was when he saw this and and that was kind of cool. So, I created an image. I don’t know for sure. I want to, you know, there’s still a lot I got to do to make sure, but this is um at Eglund Air Force Base, Camp Rudder. There’s a a troop medical clinic number eight. So, they call it the TMC. And I went back um you know, in the historic records and found in 2006 that there was this one medical building, and it hasn’t changed in 20 years, interestingly enough. So, this has to be the building that he was being treated at. And then, you know, he had said there looked like there was an open field and and treetops. There’s only one place without a lot of buildings in sight where you would have this view. And I showed it to him. He’s like, « Damn, that’s got to be it. » So, preliminary results, but and it was because you asked me, George, you wanted to see this, you know, what was he looking at? So, it was really cool. When you go into Google Maps, you can kind of go back in time and it had really hasn’t changed, but I think we found where he saw it. Now, again, the size of the craft, he’s doing a guesstimate. I really pushed him for a guesstimate of the size of craft. The distance from him, it’s a guesstimate. This was 19 years ago, but the angle of vision, I think we nailed it. So, it’s the TMZ Medical Clinic 8 Camp Rudder and it’s going right out to where um this field and the tree tops. So, let me um put this image up and you can kind of see his angle of vision and what he was looking at in this huge black silent triangle. And again, you’re not carving this in stone. This is based on the best available information. This is where you think it is based on what he told you and maps of what the base looked like a long time ago. Yeah, we’re getting medical records from 19 years ago. It’s like, you know, to to make sure this is the spot, but it is the only spot that was treating Army Rangers for things like parachute jumps where they like hurt themselves. I mean, this was the spot. It’s been the spot for 20 years. I’m pretty confident, but yeah, I always have the option of reforming my opinion if I find later it’s it’s uh be pretty awesome if those other two witnesses are willing to speak to us, even if it’s we have to block out their their identities. Yeah, I I I you know, I’m pushing for it. Uh a lot of people don’t want to come forward because they feel like, well, if this is some secret tech, you know, we want to keep it secret. National security, I totally understand that. But nobody signed NDAs or anything like that. So, I think we’ll get them. I think we’ll get them. Um segue here to something else. Of course, today uh we kind of have a return of dronea. Yeah, recall from last year um drones everywhere uh over key installations. They shut down Langley Air Force Base. They shut down Reich Patterson Air Force Base. They were seen for several weeks by hundreds of thousands of people over New Jersey, over a nuclear plant, over sensitive military installations. They were out here in the southwest over plant 42 and the same thing happened in almost all these cases. They’d come in out of nowhere undetected. They’d loiter around making themselves obvious. The lights are on. Uh nobody knew where they’re from. They would leave and could not be tracked. None of them were shot down. We don’t know who was behind them or what was going on. And now the same thing has been happening a year almost a year later across Europe. You know, you’ll recall there were several a couple of UK uh military bases, joint bases that were overflown by these drones. I think we were told by our friend Chris Sharp that there were attempts to bring them down with the best anti- drone technology. Poof, did nothing. Now, they’ve been making a nuisance of themselves over several European countries, and you have to wonder who’s behind it, what’s going on, where these things are from. We have exactly the right guy to answer those questions, right? Yeah. our man in the UK, as you said, Chris Sharp. He’s always been on this kind of stuff. I I’m I am excited. He has Liberation Times. He’s got some great articles. He’s really been dogged about the UAP thing, but also about the national security implications of what we’re calling, you know, drones at this time. So, he just knows far more than I do about this and he’s always come on this show and given us great information. I love his articles. Everybody should go check out Liberation Times. Um, but yeah, Chris Sharp, let’s bring him on. Looking sharp, Chris Sharp. What’s going on, man? So, I I took George’s advice from last week, and I thought we were all going to be in suits. I thought we were coordinating this, but obviously someone didn’t get the memo. Hey, George. Look how good that guy looks, Jeremy. Why? Why? Why can you not do that? Chris, look, man. He’s handsome, man. I can never live up to it. Looking great, Chris. Chris, it’s great to see you. We’ve been following your reporting as always. Excellent work. Yeah. The thing that’s different this time is you were kind of the lone ranger reporting on this before and in the last couple of months we’ve seen a lot of media interest across Western Europe uh other news organizations who covered this as well. Must be nice to have some company this time, huh? Yes, it’s extraordinary um to see how many headlines these instants have actually generated and to see all the open- source intelligence X accounts covering it as well. So um it’s great to get lots of information coming in and just trying to find um all the patterns from the other previous events that we’ve um been covering. So yeah, it’s been excellent. Could you give us the big picture when this current wave of drone sightings started, where they’ve been seen? Um Jeremy, unless you want to start another way. No, that sounds great. I want to hear the basics from you, Chris. Yeah, sure. So, it began late September. I think it was around the um it was the I think it was the 22nd September uh when Copenhagen airport um was closed down for hours because drones had been spotted and um it was interfering with flights. They closed it down and um one of my friends Martin um was at the scene. Um he was actually drinking in a bar I believe when he heard about the incidents and the fact that Copenhagen airport was shut down. He was like I’m going there and he took a taxi. So um we got like a real firsthand insight about how tense the situation was and he describes going to Copenhagen airport and there being special forces and police present at the scene and it was very very tense. They told him to get away get out and um he didn’t he just covered it. Brilliant. um very very good reporter I think he would make and um yeah so that that was the first night and from our understanding nothing was taken down that night and they were not able to confirm where these drones originated from uh who was controlling them and um from my understanding based on all the other events as well it seems as though the detection systems um or or both the detection systems and the jamming um systems may have um failed. Um so that was the first night and then um they branch out um over military installations um critical infrastructure in Denmark um France, Belgium, Germany. Um so this is a Europewide kind of event happening uh or series of events happening and um they also closed down Munich airport as well. Um so unlike the other drone events I’d been covering it seems this really had a big impact on civilian infrastructure such as airports um which is kind of new from what I’d previously been following because it’s usually always been military installations. Um, and the backdrop I guess here is the fact that Europe is in a very very tense situation at the moment with Russian aggression. We know that Russians have flown drones into Polish airspace and other NATO countries. Um, and you know, I I think the difference with those is that we know they’ve come from Russia. They’ve been able to been tracked. However, with these incidents, we don’t know where they’ve come from. Like the previous ones I’ve been covering, I I I I go far back as far as 2019 with the case that you you both covered in terms of the West Coast incidents. You know, we don’t know who the controller are. We don’t know where the origin is from. We don’t have any answers unfortunately. And another parallel with that case that you covered in 2019 with the case that you know we’ve seen now over Europe is the fact that they thought that they could actually pin it down to a um a they call it a um a shadow fleet I believe. So the Chinese have a shadow fleet of cargo ships and so do the Russians. So in 2019 they thought the drones swarming around US warships came from the Bass Strait which is a Hong Kong registered um cargo ship. They searched it as we knew as we know um they had eyes on it. Nothing came from that ship. Um, and then, you know, with these events, they thought they were coming from a Russian, um, well, I think it was registered under another country. Um, but it was linked to the Russian shadow fleet, and they and they searched that fleet, the French um, military search that ship, and nothing was found. Uh so again, we’re just left in a position that we we have no idea as the public uh where these things have come from and why they can’t take them down. It’s um it’s pretty crazy and I I certainly can’t explain it. Yeah. The 2019 events to this day, they don’t know where they were launched from. They don’t know where they landed. And this is what really kind of made that crossover between UAP and what we’re calling drone or unmanned aerial vehicle. You know, these objects were there without wings, without rotors. You saw that in the thermal image that’s kind of gone around now that George and I put out. You know, you’re not seeing the normal displacement of air or heat. Um the whole bass straight thing was ridiculous to me. That was pushed forward as like, oh, absolutely. If you look on Wikipedia, it came from the Bass Straight. Our own government said that we went and looked at the bass straight. I we George and I got somebody his sole task was to watch the bass straight to see if anything landed and launched. And he said on our show I wish I could report to you that it did. It would explain a lot. Nothing came from the bass straight but the typical like Wikipedia thing is that they were launched and landed from Bastra. It is untrue. It is false. It is not true. And so we’re kind of stuck with this idea of who’s the operator of these units. And the people involved in 2019, they still want answers. I mean, I’ve talked to people in every agency that I could list and they do not know where these units came from in 2019. And if you’re saying that’s the same now, same now in Europe. This is something that is uh it’s changed warfare. It’s ch whoever this is from, this has changed the whole dynamic of the theater of war. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. you’ve only got to look at the battlefields in um the Ukraine and Russia and about how drones are really changing everything and they can result in mass casualties. And we did have a proposal I believe at the beginning of the year from Lu Alzando um about having a component within the National Security Council so that it would be a sole purpose of a unit within there to actually distinguish what is UAP versus what are drones. And unfortunately that proposal was never taken up. But I I I do think that they do know more than us within the intelligence circles. And you know what I’d like to do is, you know, in terms of having answers, I I admit I I don’t have answers. I I have guesses. Um you know, I’m thinking about your previous witnesses that you’ve had on. And I’m thinking about Matthew Liblesberger, the um Green Beret who blew himself up within a C cyber truck outside the Trump hotel in January this year, claiming that you know you we’ve heard it from our sources that there is an arms race in terms of exploiting UAP technology. The the question is if there is an arms race between Russia, China, the USA, how far have they m how how much progress have they made in terms of exploiting that and who’s ahead when it comes to kind of exploiting it to its full potential? And we’ve had Matthew Livelsburg basically claim that these things that was spotted over the US in December, we had the New Jersey instance as well. remember um that they were advanced Chinese anti-gravitic tech with which could carry out an unlimited payload and it was basically a checkmate situation. Um, so I mean I don’t know, but it’s certainly interesting just looking at the cases from 2019 that you covered and the case over Langley Air Force Based, the case over Lake and Heath and these latest cases in terms of why can’t we take them down? Where are they originating from? Why are these things so spooky? You know, what is it that they’re hiding? Why can’t they just simply shoot them down? So we have a lot of unanswered questions but I do think that there is one organization um within the CIA which may have a very good idea and I do know that they do deal with the um UAP um phenomena as well and they liaz with the arrow and they leaz with the UAPF from my understanding as well. Um, and that is the um it’s the WP uh WCPMC which is the um the um CIA’s weapons and counterpreration mission center. Um yeah, it’s a real mouthful that is um and within within that it’s got an air warfare analysis branch and air defense analysis branch. So they basically they get information they can get information from NASC they can get information from um no such agency um the NSA um they can get information from um they they can get it from the um NRO um so they get a variety of projects DIA as well and they’ll use the intelligence community and they’ll use the human intelligence and all their other information they’ve got feeding into them and they’ll make an analysis about the origin of where these things may come from um whether it be drones or whether it be UAP. I feel like this is the main kind of place that we should be looking at in terms of asking the question in terms of not only the events happening over Denmark and other places around the world but also over the US as well because if it is determined or if it is thought that these things originate from a foreign actor this CIA would get involved working with another agency if it’s on US um territory. So, I I think that’s who we should be looking at for answers because it would be their job to kind of make the analysis and then determine where they’re actually coming from. Um, I know, you know, we we know that they’ve got satellites looking at the whole the globe basically that they can see this stuff and they should be able to pinpoint a um a launching point, you know, where these things are actually going from as well. And I think that one of the core things that is happening at the moment is that China, Russia, the USA, there there is hot warfare from my understanding, but just in places where we can’t see like in space where they’re knocking satellites out. Um, and I think that there is kind of like a a secret kind of like war going on. It’s hybrid warfare and I I feel this is part of it. Um, and like with Havana syndrome, the US doesn’t want to admit that it might be Russian, it might be Chinese. I mean, that that’s my best guess. Um, in terms of who’s actually dealing with this issue and where the origin might be because they seem to be obsessed with places that Russia or CH China may be interested in. So, um, those are my thoughts on it. Anyhow, well, you see the uh, you know, you were mentioning the the ones that started toward the end of September. In early September, there were other incursions that were assumed to be Russians. Uh the Poland uh where they’re testing the defenses in Poland and then Latapia and Estonia. And you can see why you’d assume it’s Russians that doing that stuff. And so the assumption is made. All these other European countries that are have drones flying over it must be Russians. And yet, you know, we see the Russians are stretched pretty thin. They’re using drones in um in Ukraine and they can’t seem to buy them and make them fast enough. They’re getting them from all over the world. And those drones don’t seem to be doing what these drones are doing. We’re shooting them down. The Ukrainians are shooting them down. These, you know, we see the Germans have now uh and the Danes have referred to them as as surveillance uh technology, assuming that it’s some other country that’s flying them. But again, and the Germans have said, « We’re going to start shooting them down. They haven’t shot any down. Right. It reminds of us of what happened in in the UK, the stories that you covered where they did whip out the most advanced anti- drone technology we have and had no effect. Correct. Yeah. Yeah. That that that’s very very accurate. Um they had two Cobra meetings as well, which is kind of like the emergency meetings that they have at um 10 Downing Street involved in the prime minister. this was taken really really seriously because they were very very they seemed helpless. If these things had a payload, if these things turned out to be, you know, lethal and they had um you know, they wanted to cause damage. They could have they could have and it, you know, we’ve been covering what’s been we’ve been looking about what’s been going on in in the war. And um I believe another one of the um the fears is that these things may have a payload. If you return to sender, they may have been pre-coordinated to actually go to the uh to the airfield um land on somewhere that’s um critical and then explode. I’m sorry, civilian airports. I mean, what would if they’re surveillance platforms, what would be the point of Russia, which is stretched pretty thin, sending precious drones to fly over Danish or German civilian airports to do surveillance? And they’re not exactly hiding it. I mean, they’re flying at night with lights on. It seems more of a provocation than surveillance. I I want to know what’s I I I say I I know my my mind takes me to um to Havana syndrome again because you think if the Russians are doing this to um intelligence staff, that’s a provocation that can cause a war. And I think there was some speculation is that if the the CIA or the intelligence community admitted it was Russian, it would then take us that much closer toward that was one of the reasons given. One of the other reasons given is that perhaps the US and UK maybe um are doing the same thing to um to Russia as well. And once you kind of admit the Russians are doing it, then you have to admit that you’ve got this technology and you know what’s going on and you’re using it yourself. And the thing it makes me think about as well is I’m I’m thinking about um Immaculate Constellation and the documentation you were given. You know, we we saw that um on two occasions, I believe, Russian intelligence ships um were seen like one day viewing with um triangular craft. I think this all points to the fact that Russia or speculation that Russia does know a lot when it comes to advanced tech. either it possesses such tech or it is in some kind of in communication with uh another kind of like form of intelligence perhaps. Do you think we could take them down if we wanted to take them down? Senator Gillibrand inserted something in the National Defense Bill saying that military bases can now take them down if they fly over them. Can we take them down if we wanted to? If we’re talking about what Matthew Liveberger is speculating that these things may be like anti-gravitic or something like that um then that suggests that they’ve got a power source which is uh which generates a lot of power. Um, and if you were to shoot something like that down from the sky, what would be the impact? Um, we we know that, you know, the US was toying with potentially having nuclear um like bombers like generated nuclearpowered bombers um after World War II, but it was deemed as too dangerous. You can have nuclear generated kind of um or nuclear powered submarines, aircraft carriers, but you can’t do that with aircraft. Um I I believe the Russians have a nuclear um fueled um rocket with unlimited range. Um but why don’t they have those for aircraft as well? Um maybe they are using some kind of nuclear device and if you did take them down it would cause a very very nasty um incident. um which could endanger a lot of lives. This is the thing. This is the thing about what what why don’t we know because as well you have to figure that why are these things flying with lights on? Um if they were Russian, they were caught in the act that they were shot down and we were able to kind of ascertain they were they were Russian. Again, it would cause a big international incident. It would cause embarrassment for Russia. We’ve caught you. Look, you know, similar to what happened with the Chinese balloon. It was a major embarrassment for the Chinese. Um, and it could happen with Russia as well, but with the current tensions, um, it could potentially force the US and NATO into into a war. Um, but again, George, you’ve got to question like why are they not utilizing this technology in Ukraine at the moment where they could really do with it? And at the moment, they getting drones from China, getting drones from Iran and all sorts of countries anywhere they can. So the these are the difficult questions. Um but you know like like you know like what like I know that there is um like in the US as well you’ve got kind of like um the shadowy world of the classified where they’ve got probably very very advanced weaponry um and then you’ve got what you see in the unclassified world uh where the most advanced tech that the US has is you know the stealth the stealth jet um so you kind of got to think how about how those worlds are managed. on the public stage when it comes to conflict. If Russia did have some really advanced technology and it started using it over Ukraine and the world was to report on such technology being utilized, then obviously it puts the US in a really really bad situation with nothing to counter that technology. Well, wow. Russia is ahead of the US when it comes to technology. Now, Russia has a triangular craft that can kind of like hover on its own and generate its own power. It’s like this is crazy. Um how would the US react to that if that did come out? Well, the US if it did have such technology would have to show its own hand and say well actually we do have this technology and again that might might have its own impact. So we have to go down all these paths and I know it’s it’s horrible not knowing the answers. I really don’t like a lot of the um the open source intelligence accounts that think they do know the answers about where these things are coming from and they do know what they are. Like I’m happy to admit this is always all speculation on my part. I I really don’t have any good evidence to show where they’re coming from, but we can have a look at the patterns, can’t we, of behavior when it comes to these things. Um, and it all seems to have a lot in common. You know, they’re very, very brave in their behavior. They show their lights. They’re not able to be taken down. Can’t be tracked. We don’t know how they’re controlled. Um, it’s very, very bizarre. It’s a big payday coming for defense contractors. Chris, like you and Jeremy, I subscribe to all these defense newsletters uh about contracts and defense contractors and what they’re up to. And every single day there’s a new article about a big fat contract being given to somebody to develop a new system of anti- drone tech. There was something that was on it was on Twitter um a couple of days ago and it’s a giant cannon. It looks like a cannon that would be on the Death Star. Boom, boom, boom. shooting at the rebel uh uh craft and is supposedly capable of knocking down a dozen drones at a at a shot. Um I can’t wait till that gets out there and let’s see what it can do, you know. But it’s a big payday for big fat defense contractors as everything is I don’t know what the implications would be like what you said Chris if these are nuclearpowered um units that are out there. let’s just say from like a a normal um you know terrestrial you know country and we have these nuclearpowered drones like what is the implication of shooting them down? So all of a sudden you have like a some nuclear uh reactor that’s hit the ground. Do you think that’s part of the problem with why um things can’t just be shot at out the sky or potentially? potentially. Yeah, this is the this the this is the whole problem when it when it comes to this all these activities are clandestine and the US may be doing it um within Russia and China and then likewise um we may be doing it to them. Uh and and the trouble is with um Russian media and with Chinese media, you know, we’re dealing with authoritarian states. we may not perhaps hear about stories about incursions over their military bases as we do our military bases. So I I do I do think that is potentially one of the one of the the problems in terms of the um the nuclear the nuclear reactors and nuclear material kind of um causing a major incident. And you know I go back to the immaculate constellation document that was presented by Matthew Brown again. These things do seem to be rendeing with um with Russian I think a Chinese ship perhaps as well um within the Atlantic and the Pacific. And I have no reason to believe that’s not true. But again, you have to think, you know, um at the very least Russia and China um realize that this technology does exist. And I’d be very very surprised if the technology hasn’t been exploited in some way or another. Um, again, we’re dealing with um the classified world here, you know. um we’re having a unclassified conversation when it comes to this whole topic of these drones, but there’s also classified um conversations happening in skiffs as well um with people who read into um you know saps and caps and and that’s the really and we know how serious they treat the security when it comes to even having a conversation when it comes to classified materials and That’s that that’s the thing that I really really dislike most about this whole thing because I’m pretty sure that they know a lot more about the nature of these drones um than we do um within the intelligence world. Um I’ll just say this, Jeremy. I don’t know what the weaponized budget is like. I don’t you know I’ve had more than enough travel for to last me the rest of my life, but if we need to go to Copenhagen, I’m willing to go and spend some time on the ground there. and Sweden and Norway as well. I mean, I’ll make that sacrifice. Be awesome, man. You got a lot of fans in Denmark, by the way. I just want to mention it. I went to Copenhagen like two years ago. I mean, you’re both celebrities there, you know. I wouldn’t be surprised if they pay a mural of you both the buildings in I was there uh I was there some years ago at an invitation and just loved it. Just absolutely loved it. You got to watch out for the bicycle mafia when you’re walking down the street there in Copenhagen. But everything else was fabulous. So, yeah, willing to go. Yeah, a lot of people have been asking me lately like there’s some journalists looking into the UFO topic and um even some agency people, you know, just asking, do I believe that we have reverse engineered any of this technology? I I just curious, George, after all this time you’ve you’ve looked at this, I know we all hope that we have. Um, and I know a lot of the stories that you’ve broken, the indications are that we have reverse engineered some of this technology. But what if you bottomlined it, George, do you think we have any operational craft that that display this kind of technology? I really don’t know. I mean, I I don’t think it requires nonhuman intelligence to build the kind of drone things, UAS, UAV systems that we’re seeing. We just don’t know how they work right now out here in the unclassified world. I don’t think that requires alien tech to build something like that. But maybe, you know, maybe it is. I mean, I, you know, what we’ve all heard from our sources is that we haven’t made much progress in reverse engineering this stuff with the one exception of the Russians who had had some success with a beam weapon. I don’t think it’s operational. At least it wasn’t the last time I had heard. But they did do some testing on something that they got from a crash site. But I I have no indication that we’ve uh we’ve got a a sport model that we have built and are operating out there. Uh then again, we just heard a an amazing story in the previous episode of Weaponized of something at Eglund years ago that if it’s not ours, we’re certainly in league with it. It was sitting there and with all of our personnel, US personnel around it seemed to be some kind of a cooperation going on there. So, you know, I don’t know. George and Jeremy, would would we be correct in terms of reverse engineering and roles that each agency might have that it would be the DOE or Patel uh that would be in charge of kind of propulsion systems and power sources. So if something like that did something like that, if that had been reverse engineered, it wouldn’t necessarily come from the DoD. That would make sense. Sure. particular aspects of the technology that you just described, it would make sense to be in DOE. And also from a practical standpoint, it’s a lot harder to get information out of DOE, extra lay layers of secrecy even compared to DoD or DO now. Yeah. All these people that have come to us, it’s not like one person, it’s not like two people, it’s not like within the last, you know, couple months. This is for George like you know 40 years you know people have been coming to a journalist and saying we have craft of unknown origin technology of unknown origin and we are trying to reverse engineer that technology maybe it started for George with Lazar but you had Dr. Latsky come on our show and say that we breached a hole of a technology of unknown origin. No wings, no rotors, no tail, no fuel, no no even fuel that they could see. I don’t know how you’d reverse engineer that, but it’s not like one person that’s come forward. There are people that said these are from archaeological digs, at least some of the power sources, if not the full craft. You know, we we’d have to dismiss everybody that’s come, you know, to me and George, George for 40 years, to say, look, there there’s nothing to see here. Move on. I I I I buy it. I buy it that there is u a technology far more advanced that we didn’t make and that we’ve been trying. I I I buy it. I can’t prove it today. I definitively prove it today. It’s not really my job maybe, but um I can’t dismiss all the people that have come forward to us in different capacity to give us this base narrative, this base understanding. And I don’t think they were tricked. I don’t think that this is some big scop and everybody’s in on it except for me, me and George, and you. I don’t buy that. So I I don’t know what the truth is, but it’s got to be somewhere in the middle there. You know, Dr. Latsky is pretty well connected. He’s been at this a long time. He’s pretty deep on the inside. He shared like two sentences that he was cleared to say, « We’ve breached the hull. We’ve been inside. » That doesn’t ex exactly instill a lot of confidence that we figured out how it works. That we finally managed to get inside. Uh doesn’t sound like we’re flying it around to go to 7-Eleven to pick up a six-pack, you know. So, right. We’ll have to get him back here, Jeremy, pretty soon. I would love that. I would love that. He just wrote a new book, you you know, it’s a guy we squeeze him, maybe we’ll get more good information. I I It’d be great to have him on again. Yeah. Chris, thanks very much for your time. Anything else to add to this? I mean, you do still leave room in your conspiratorial scenario for good oldfashioned non-human intelligence stuff floating around out there, not just advanced craft that the Russians, Chinese, and you and Americans don’t want to tell the public about. Yeah. Yeah. Well, Marik from Ren Camp and I talk quite frequently about this and he’ll point to similar kind of um incursions over US Air Force bases going decades back I think 1960s 1970s um before you had this kind of drone technology that we do have now. So um I think that’s definitely worth noting and and I am aware of instance over New Jersey where it doesn’t seem to me like we are dealing with drones at all as well. So, I mean, we can’t always treat it as a black and white situation. Reality is much more nuanced with many layers. Um, and I’d also point out as well that I just find it very, very bizarre with To the Stars Academy, their whole big thing when they first came out was about actually um producing a kind of anti-gravity craft of their own. That that was the prime aspect about what they were all about. and you had Steve Justice, you had Chris Melon among many, many others who signed up to that and put their name behind TTSA. I’ve been trying to get in touch with TTSA to ask them about that. I’ve got no comment at all from them. So, I just think that’s very interesting. If the technology didn’t exist, why would someone like Steve Justice and all the others involved to the stars academy put their names behind that project if the technology didn’t exist? And if the technology did exist, why would you do so via Tom Dange and to the Stars Academy instead of classifying that text straight away and creating it under, you know, um, Loheed Martin buried under deep secrecy. I I don’t understand that either. Good point. All right, Chris Sharp, thanks very much. Please keep us in the loop. You’re on the cutting edge of that story there as always. Um, doing great work. Thank you. You know, it does get complicated, Jeremy, with the the big geopolitical picture, Russians, Chinese, US, and and it makes sense what Chris was saying about we may be doing the same thing to them, and nobody wants to admit it because it would lead to perhaps dire consequences, but you know, you and I hearken back to what had happened a year ago and some of the things that were underway, and it it’s scary uh some of the some of the incidents and reports that came our way. Correct. Yeah. So, two things Chris said that were interesting. One is what if they uh changed the return to sender to be back at the base, which is something that you do if something’s got a bomb on it. You do return to sender and it and it’s supposed to go back. It’s a very famous kind of hack you can do. But that’s a good point. What if you do return to sender and they they just change the metadata to make it look like it was the point of origin they wanted to bomb? So, there there’s some real issues and you and I talked about this way before the drone thing was even like a word. We said every UFO is going to be called a drone and and all the drones are going to be called UFOs for a while and it’s going to confuse everything. And we’re seeing that now. Um we’re absolutely seeing that now. But you and I would get reports that were substantial that were substantiated and were important that were so bizarre. So during that uh New Jersey drone stuff, there was a critical infrastructure facility, also an energy facility in that area. And we got word from reliable sources that there was footage of a pyramidshaped object lifting up out of the bay and hovering and loitering over this critical infrastructure. And indeed, there was an incursion and something was hovering over it. And we were told there was footage of it. So you and I asked the sources. We’re like, « Do you want to report this up because it’s not working for you right now reporting it up? There are people in the FBI that want to know and they’re like, « Absolutely. I I don’t want to break any rules, » they said, « but there’s footage of it. It’s sitting on this Honeywell server, and we I do want this is important. This is a defense. » And we we told the FBI, we told them, we connected them to exactly where it would be. And then before they could go look for that Honeywell footage, for the first time in history that this individual knew about it, that footage was gone. It was deleted off of the server. So you and I kind of learned real quick about those servers and how it works. But that is that is real. We reported that to the FBI because we were told that the individuals that were giving us that information wanted it reported. It was a pyramid-shaped object lifted out of the water. I mean, close camera proximity, by the way, not like a blurry image. and um and it was deleted. So I we don’t know who deleted it. We put it in the hands of an investigatory body that we were hoping would get to the bottom. Of course, they’re not going to tell us if they get to the bottom of it, but we were informed that the footage was deleted before arrival and not by the individual that informed us. So there’s so many questions, man, about this stuff, you know, UAP, UFO, um you know, drones. It it gets confusing even for me. I have fatigue with this but it gets confusing. But I do use a pyramid though. Not a not a triangle. Pyramid melt, doesn’t it? Well, triangular by angle of observation. Pyramidal in shape. Melt. All right. Well, a lot to chew on here. We’ve got some pretty cool stuff coming in the near future on weaponized. So, um, get some sleep and we’ll see you soon. Okay. Thanks, George. [Music] .

Déroulement de la vidéo:

0.8 four airports in Denmark last night when drones appeared in their airspace. Flights were grounded.
6.319 It’s extraordinary um to see how many headlines these incidents have actually
13.28 generated and going to Copenhagen airport and there being special forces
18.96 and police present at the scene. You’d assume it’s Russians that doing that stuff. And so the assumption is made all
25.6 these other European countries that are have drones flying over must be Russians. And yet, you know, we see the
31.439 Russians are stretched pretty thin. They’re using drones in um in Ukraine
36.96 and they can’t seem to buy them and make them fast enough. They’re getting them from all over the world. And those
42.239 drones don’t seem to be doing what these drones are doing. They did whip out the most advanced anti- drone technology we
48.48 have and it had no effect. Correct. Yeah. Yeah. That that that’s very very
53.68 accurate. We got word from reliable sources that there was footage of a
58.719 pyramidshaped object lifting up out of the bay and hovering and loitering over
64.479 this critical infrastructure. This is weaponized.
71.39 [Music]
77.52 This is weaponized. I’m George Knap hanging out in temperate and beautiful Las Vegas, Nevada. Uh, I’m telling you,
84.08 October is the nicest time of the year to be here. I am joined by my friend and colleague, Jeremy Corbel, who is keeping
90.08 a low profile somewhere on the West Coast. Jeremy, how’s it going? Pretty good, man. Yeah, just hiding out,
95.68 trying not to um talk too much. I’m trying to listen more. I see that you listen to my suggested
102.079 dress code, right? Yeah. Yeah. Suit and tie. That’s right. As always,
107.119 we got a lot to cover today. We’re going to go uh check in with our friend Christopher Sharp talk about drona
113.04 palooa. But first uh want to revisit something that we touched on last week at great interview with your friend
118.799 Daniel about something that was seen gigantic triangle hovering right over a runway at Eglund Air Force Base. You
125.439 have an update on that? Yeah, just um you know look, Daniel was a great witness. He went through the
131.36 entire process of vetting with Congress and he has a very small experience in
137.36 that he just saw something. But it gave me a lot of hope because if what he saw
142.56 is something we were operating then maybe we do have some control over this um really extraordinary technology. I
150.4 don’t know what to make of it, but I thought bringing him out on weaponized was important because he didn’t testify
155.44 to Congress and it wasn’t like he was waiting to come out on weaponized. He literally couldn’t do it that the
161.2 weekend Congress had him. He he was willing to do it. He couldn’t do it. He was uh I don’t know give away too much
166.4 but it was a it was a very positive thing in his life um that he was doing on that on on that time period. So I
172.8 just thought let’s bring him out. Now what’s happened since then since then is that people have come and said we also
180.64 saw this extraordinary technology camp rudder Eglund Air Force Base. They’re
185.68 not willing to go on record at this time. And you know, I’m trying. Yes, I’m
191.44 trying to get them to come forward. So, it was just kind of neat to hear a little bit more about people that have seen this extraordinary triangular
197.76 shaped technology that doesn’t seem to lift with air displacement or jets or
203.04 anything like that. Now, I don’t know. I don’t have anything else to report on that other than I think I’ve been able
208.319 to with Daniel to identify exactly where he was when he saw this and and that was
214.48 kind of cool. So, I created an image. I don’t know for sure. I want to, you know, there’s still a lot I got to do to
220.0 make sure, but this is um at Eglund Air Force Base, Camp Rudder. There’s a a troop medical clinic number eight. So,
226.959 they call it the TMC. And I went back um you know, in the historic records and found in 2006 that there was this one
233.76 medical building, and it hasn’t changed in 20 years, interestingly enough. So,
238.799 this has to be the building that he was being treated at. And then, you know, he had said there looked like there was an
244.56 open field and and treetops. There’s only one place without a lot of buildings in sight where you would have
250.959 this view. And I showed it to him. He’s like, « Damn, that’s got to be it. » So, preliminary results, but and it was
257.68 because you asked me, George, you wanted to see this, you know, what was he looking at? So, it was really cool. When you go into Google Maps, you can kind of
263.52 go back in time and it had really hasn’t changed, but I think we found where he saw it. Now, again, the size of the
269.199 craft, he’s doing a guesstimate. I really pushed him for a guesstimate of the size of craft. The distance from
274.479 him, it’s a guesstimate. This was 19 years ago, but the angle of vision, I think we nailed it. So, it’s the TMZ
281.28 Medical Clinic 8 Camp Rudder and it’s going right out to where um this field and the tree
287.68 tops. So, let me um put this image up and you can kind of see his angle of vision and what he was looking at in
293.919 this huge black silent triangle. And again, you’re not carving this in stone. This is based on the best
300.24 available information. This is where you think it is based on what he told you and maps of what the base looked like a
306.72 long time ago. Yeah, we’re getting medical records from 19 years ago. It’s like, you know, to to make sure this is the spot, but it is
313.6 the only spot that was treating Army Rangers for things like parachute jumps where they like hurt themselves. I mean,
319.759 this was the spot. It’s been the spot for 20 years. I’m pretty confident, but yeah, I always have the option of
325.919 reforming my opinion if I find later it’s it’s uh be pretty awesome if those other two
331.039 witnesses are willing to speak to us, even if it’s we have to block out their their identities. Yeah, I I I you know, I’m pushing for
338.16 it. Uh a lot of people don’t want to come forward because they feel like, well, if this is some secret tech, you
343.28 know, we want to keep it secret. National security, I totally understand that. But nobody signed NDAs or anything like that. So, I think we’ll get them. I
350.56 think we’ll get them. Um segue here to something else. Of course, today uh we kind of have a return of dronea.
358.24 Yeah, recall from last year um drones everywhere uh over key installations.
364.0 They shut down Langley Air Force Base. They shut down Reich Patterson Air Force Base. They were seen for several weeks
370.08 by hundreds of thousands of people over New Jersey, over a nuclear plant, over sensitive military installations. They
376.4 were out here in the southwest over plant 42 and the same thing happened in
382.24 almost all these cases. They’d come in out of nowhere undetected. They’d loiter around making themselves obvious. The
388.639 lights are on. Uh nobody knew where they’re from. They would leave and could not be tracked. None of them were shot
395.12 down. We don’t know who was behind them or what was going on. And now the same thing has been happening a year almost a
401.759 year later across Europe. You know, you’ll recall there were several a couple of UK uh military bases, joint
408.24 bases that were overflown by these drones. I think we were told by our friend Chris Sharp that there were
413.68 attempts to bring them down with the best anti- drone technology. Poof, did nothing. Now, they’ve been making a
419.68 nuisance of themselves over several European countries, and you have to wonder who’s behind it, what’s going on,
425.039 where these things are from. We have exactly the right guy to answer those questions, right?
430.24 Yeah. our man in the UK, as you said, Chris Sharp. He’s always been on this kind of stuff. I I’m I am excited. He
436.88 has Liberation Times. He’s got some great articles. He’s really been dogged about the UAP thing, but also about the
442.56 national security implications of what we’re calling, you know, drones at this time. So, he just knows far more than I
448.319 do about this and he’s always come on this show and given us great information. I love his articles. Everybody should go check out Liberation
454.56 Times. Um, but yeah, Chris Sharp, let’s bring him on. Looking sharp, Chris Sharp. What’s going on, man?
461.039 So, I I took George’s advice from last week, and I thought we were all going to be in suits. I thought we were
466.96 coordinating this, but obviously someone didn’t get the memo. Hey, George. Look how good that guy looks, Jeremy.
473.599 Why? Why? Why can you not do that? Chris, look, man. He’s handsome, man. I can never live up to it. Looking great,
480.08 Chris. Chris, it’s great to see you. We’ve been following your reporting as always. Excellent work. Yeah.
485.84 The thing that’s different this time is you were kind of the lone ranger reporting on this before and in the last
491.28 couple of months we’ve seen a lot of media interest across Western Europe uh
496.479 other news organizations who covered this as well. Must be nice to have some company this time, huh? Yes, it’s
503.919 extraordinary um to see how many headlines these instants have actually
510.639 generated and to see all the open- source intelligence X accounts covering it as well. So um
517.839 it’s great to get lots of information coming in and just trying to find um all
523.36 the patterns from the other previous events that we’ve um been covering. So yeah, it’s been excellent. Could you
529.839 give us the big picture when this current wave of drone sightings started, where they’ve been seen? Um Jeremy,
537.2 unless you want to start another way. No, that sounds great. I want to hear the basics from you, Chris.
542.32 Yeah, sure. So, it began late September. I think it was around the um it was the
549.2 I think it was the 22nd September uh when Copenhagen airport um was closed
556.16 down for hours because drones had been spotted and um it was interfering with flights. They closed it down and um one
564.08 of my friends Martin um was at the scene. Um he was actually drinking in a
569.68 bar I believe when he heard about the incidents and the fact that Copenhagen airport was shut down. He was like I’m
574.959 going there and he took a taxi. So um we got like a real firsthand insight about how tense the situation was and he
581.44 describes going to Copenhagen airport and there being special forces and
587.2 police present at the scene and it was very very tense. They told him to get away get out and um he didn’t he just
594.8 covered it. Brilliant. um very very good reporter I think he would make and um yeah so that that was the first night
602.0 and from our understanding nothing was taken down that night and they were not
609.839 able to confirm where these drones originated from uh who was controlling
616.399 them and um from my understanding based on all the other events as well it seems
621.839 as though the detection systems um or or both the detection systems and the
628.0 jamming um systems may have um failed. Um so that was the first night and then
634.399 um they branch out um over military installations
639.44 um critical infrastructure in Denmark um France, Belgium, Germany. Um so this is
648.079 a Europewide kind of event happening uh or series of events happening and um
653.36 they also closed down Munich airport as well. Um so unlike the other drone
660.0 events I’d been covering it seems this really had a big impact on civilian infrastructure such as airports um which
667.68 is kind of new from what I’d previously been following because it’s usually always been military installations. Um,
675.6 and the backdrop I guess here is the fact that Europe is in a very very tense
680.88 situation at the moment with Russian aggression. We know that Russians have flown drones into Polish airspace and
687.92 other NATO countries. Um, and you know, I I think the difference with those is
693.76 that we know they’ve come from Russia. They’ve been able to been tracked. However, with these incidents, we don’t
699.12 know where they’ve come from. Like the previous ones I’ve been covering, I I I I go far back as far as 2019 with the
707.36 case that you you both covered in terms of the West Coast incidents. You know, we don’t know who the controller are. We
713.04 don’t know where the origin is from. We don’t have any answers unfortunately.
718.48 And another parallel with that case that you covered in 2019 with the case that
723.6 you know we’ve seen now over Europe is the fact that they thought that they could actually pin it down to a um a
730.88 they call it a um a shadow fleet I believe. So the Chinese have a shadow fleet of cargo ships and so do the
738.72 Russians. So in 2019 they thought the drones swarming around US warships came
743.76 from the Bass Strait which is a Hong Kong registered um cargo ship. They searched it as we knew as we know um
750.959 they had eyes on it. Nothing came from that ship. Um, and then, you know, with
757.44 these events, they thought they were coming from a Russian, um, well, I think
762.959 it was registered under another country. Um, but it was linked to the Russian
768.079 shadow fleet, and they and they searched that fleet, the French um, military search that ship, and nothing was found.
774.639 Uh so again, we’re just left in a position that we we have no idea as the public uh where these things have come
781.6 from and why they can’t take them down. It’s um it’s pretty crazy and I I
786.88 certainly can’t explain it. Yeah. The 2019 events to this day, they
794.56 don’t know where they were launched from. They don’t know where they landed. And this is what really kind of made
799.68 that crossover between UAP and what we’re calling drone or unmanned aerial vehicle. You know, these objects were
806.32 there without wings, without rotors. You saw that in the thermal image that’s kind of gone around now that George and
812.079 I put out. You know, you’re not seeing the normal displacement of air or heat. Um the whole bass straight thing was
818.56 ridiculous to me. That was pushed forward as like, oh, absolutely. If you look on Wikipedia, it came from the Bass Straight. Our own government said that
825.839 we went and looked at the bass straight. I we George and I got somebody his sole task was to watch the bass straight to
833.36 see if anything landed and launched. And he said on our show I wish I could report to you that it did. It would
838.639 explain a lot. Nothing came from the bass straight but the typical like Wikipedia thing is that they were
845.279 launched and landed from Bastra. It is untrue. It is false. It is not true. And
850.399 so we’re kind of stuck with this idea of who’s the operator of these units. And the people involved in 2019, they still
856.56 want answers. I mean, I’ve talked to people in every agency that I could list and they do not know where these units
862.8 came from in 2019. And if you’re saying that’s the same now, same now in Europe.
868.32 This is something that is uh it’s changed warfare. It’s ch whoever this is from, this has changed the whole dynamic
874.16 of the theater of war. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. you’ve only got to look at the battlefields in um the
881.199 Ukraine and Russia and about how drones are really changing everything and they can result in mass casualties. And we
888.48 did have a proposal I believe at the beginning of the year from Lu Alzando um about having a component within the
896.32 National Security Council so that it would be a sole purpose of a unit within
902.56 there to actually distinguish what is UAP versus what are drones. And
910.88 unfortunately that proposal was never taken up. But I I I do think that they do know more than us within the
916.959 intelligence circles. And you know what I’d like to do is, you know, in terms of
922.16 having answers, I I admit I I don’t have answers. I I have guesses. Um you know,
927.92 I’m thinking about your previous witnesses that you’ve had on. And I’m thinking about Matthew Liblesberger, the
934.079 um Green Beret who blew himself up within a C cyber truck outside the Trump hotel in January this year, claiming
941.199 that you know you we’ve heard it from our sources that there is an arms race
946.24 in terms of exploiting UAP technology. The the question is if there is an arms race between Russia, China, the USA, how
953.759 far have they m how how much progress have they made in terms of exploiting that and who’s ahead when it comes to
960.079 kind of exploiting it to its full potential? And we’ve had Matthew Livelsburg basically claim that these
966.32 things that was spotted over the US in December, we had the New Jersey instance as well. remember um that they were
973.6 advanced Chinese anti-gravitic tech with which could carry out an unlimited
979.12 payload and it was basically a checkmate situation. Um, so
985.279 I mean I don’t know, but it’s certainly interesting just looking at the cases from 2019 that you covered and the case
992.56 over Langley Air Force Based, the case over Lake and Heath and these latest cases in terms of why can’t we take them
999.44 down? Where are they originating from? Why are these things so spooky? You know, what is it that they’re hiding?
1004.8 Why can’t they just simply shoot them down? So we have a lot of unanswered questions but I do think that there is
1011.68 one organization um within the CIA which may have a very
1016.72 good idea and I do know that they do deal with the um UAP um phenomena as
1022.32 well and they liaz with the arrow and they leaz with the UAPF from my understanding as well. Um, and that is
1029.52 the um it’s the WP uh WCPMC
1035.12 which is the um the um CIA’s weapons and
1040.4 counterpreration mission center. Um yeah, it’s a real mouthful that is um
1046.0 and within within that it’s got an air warfare analysis branch and air defense analysis branch. So they basically they
1052.96 get information they can get information from NASC they can get information from
1058.799 um no such agency um the NSA um they can get information from um they they can
1065.679 get it from the um NRO um so they get a variety of projects DIA as well and
1071.84 they’ll use the intelligence community and they’ll use the human intelligence and all their other information they’ve
1077.52 got feeding into them and they’ll make an analysis about the origin of where these things may come from um whether it
1083.2 be drones or whether it be UAP. I feel like this is the main kind of place that
1090.08 we should be looking at in terms of asking the question in terms of not only
1095.28 the events happening over Denmark and other places around the world but also over the US as well because if it is
1100.96 determined or if it is thought that these things originate from a foreign actor this CIA would get involved
1107.039 working with another agency if it’s on US um territory. So, I I think that’s
1112.48 who we should be looking at for answers because it would be their job to kind of make the analysis and then determine
1120.0 where they’re actually coming from. Um, I know, you know, we we know that they’ve got satellites looking at the
1126.24 whole the globe basically that they can see this stuff and they should be able
1131.76 to pinpoint a um a launching point, you know, where these things are actually
1137.679 going from as well. And I think that one of the core things that is happening at the moment is that China, Russia, the
1146.0 USA, there there is hot warfare from my understanding, but just in places where
1152.0 we can’t see like in space where they’re knocking satellites out. Um, and I think
1157.84 that there is kind of like a a secret kind of like war going on. It’s hybrid
1163.679 warfare and I I feel this is part of it. Um, and like with Havana syndrome, the
1170.4 US doesn’t want to admit that it might be Russian, it might be Chinese. I mean,
1175.44 that that’s my best guess. Um, in terms of who’s actually dealing with this issue and where the origin might be
1182.24 because they seem to be obsessed with places that Russia or CH China may be interested in. So, um, those are my
1188.48 thoughts on it. Anyhow, well, you see the uh, you know, you were mentioning the the ones that started
1193.919 toward the end of September. In early September, there were other incursions that were assumed to be Russians. Uh the
1200.0 Poland uh where they’re testing the defenses in Poland and then Latapia and Estonia. And you can see why you’d
1206.48 assume it’s Russians that doing that stuff. And so the assumption is made. All these other European countries that
1211.84 are have drones flying over it must be Russians. And yet, you know, we see the Russians are stretched pretty thin.
1218.48 They’re using drones in um in Ukraine and they can’t seem to buy them and make
1224.16 them fast enough. They’re getting them from all over the world. And those drones don’t seem to be doing what these drones are doing. We’re shooting them
1230.0 down. The Ukrainians are shooting them down. These, you know, we see the Germans have now uh and the Danes have
1237.6 referred to them as as surveillance uh technology, assuming that it’s some
1242.64 other country that’s flying them. But again, and the Germans have said, « We’re going to start shooting them down.
1248.4 They haven’t shot any down. Right. It reminds of us of what happened in in the UK, the stories that you covered where
1254.559 they did whip out the most advanced anti- drone technology we have and had no effect. Correct.
1261.679 Yeah. Yeah. That that that’s very very accurate. Um they had two Cobra meetings as well, which is kind of like the
1267.919 emergency meetings that they have at um 10 Downing Street involved in the prime minister. this was taken really really
1273.6 seriously because they were very very they seemed helpless. If these things had a payload, if these things turned
1280.32 out to be, you know, lethal and they had um you know, they wanted to cause
1286.08 damage. They could have they could have and it, you know, we’ve been covering what’s been we’ve been looking about what’s
1292.4 been going on in in the war. And um I believe another one of the um the fears
1297.679 is that these things may have a payload. If you return to sender, they may have been pre-coordinated to actually go to
1304.24 the uh to the airfield um land on somewhere that’s um critical and then
1311.44 explode. I’m sorry, civilian airports. I mean, what would if they’re surveillance
1317.36 platforms, what would be the point of Russia, which is stretched pretty thin, sending precious drones to fly over
1324.4 Danish or German civilian airports to do surveillance? And they’re not exactly hiding it. I mean, they’re flying at
1330.64 night with lights on. It seems more of a provocation than surveillance.
1336.159 I I want to know what’s I I I say I I know my my mind takes me to um to Havana
1344.559 syndrome again because you think if the Russians are doing this to um
1349.679 intelligence staff, that’s a provocation that can cause a war. And I think there was some speculation is that if the the
1356.32 CIA or the intelligence community admitted it was Russian, it would then take us that much closer toward that was
1361.76 one of the reasons given. One of the other reasons given is that perhaps the US and UK maybe um are doing the same
1370.0 thing to um to Russia as well. And once you kind of admit the Russians are doing it, then you have to admit that you’ve
1375.919 got this technology and you know what’s going on and you’re using it yourself. And the thing it makes me think about as
1381.28 well is I’m I’m thinking about um Immaculate Constellation and the
1386.4 documentation you were given. You know, we we saw that um on two occasions, I believe, Russian intelligence ships um
1393.44 were seen like one day viewing with um triangular craft.
1399.039 I think this all points to the fact that Russia or speculation that Russia
1405.44 does know a lot when it comes to advanced tech. either it possesses such tech or it is in some kind of in
1412.24 communication with uh another kind of like form of intelligence perhaps. Do you think we could take them down if
1418.32 we wanted to take them down? Senator Gillibrand inserted something in the National Defense Bill saying that
1424.72 military bases can now take them down if they fly over them. Can we take them down if we wanted to?
1431.2 If we’re talking about what Matthew Liveberger is speculating that these things may be like anti-gravitic or
1437.2 something like that um then that suggests that they’ve got a power source which is uh
1443.2 which generates a lot of power. Um, and if you were to shoot something like that
1448.24 down from the sky, what would be the impact? Um, we we know
1454.0 that, you know, the US was toying with potentially having nuclear um like
1461.039 bombers like generated nuclearpowered bombers um after World War II, but it
1467.36 was deemed as too dangerous. You can have nuclear generated kind of um or nuclear powered submarines, aircraft
1472.96 carriers, but you can’t do that with aircraft. Um I I believe the Russians
1478.159 have a nuclear um fueled um rocket with unlimited range. Um but why don’t they
1485.36 have those for aircraft as well? Um maybe they are using some kind of nuclear device and if you did take them
1491.919 down it would cause a very very nasty um incident. um which could endanger a
1499.84 lot of lives. This is the thing. This is the thing about what what why don’t we know because as well you have to figure
1505.039 that why are these things flying with lights on? Um if they were Russian, they were caught in the act that they were
1510.08 shot down and we were able to kind of ascertain they were they were Russian. Again, it would cause a big international incident. It would cause
1516.88 embarrassment for Russia. We’ve caught you. Look, you know, similar to what happened with the Chinese balloon. It
1522.88 was a major embarrassment for the Chinese. Um, and it could happen with Russia as well, but with the current
1528.96 tensions, um, it could potentially force the US
1534.4 and NATO into into a war. Um, but again, George, you’ve got to question like why
1539.52 are they not utilizing this technology in Ukraine at the moment where they could really do with it? And at the
1545.36 moment, they getting drones from China, getting drones from Iran and all sorts of countries anywhere they can. So the
1551.76 these are the difficult questions. Um but you know like like you know like what like I know that there is um like
1558.64 in the US as well you’ve got kind of like um the shadowy world of the classified where they’ve got probably
1566.48 very very advanced weaponry um and then you’ve got what you see in the unclassified world uh where the most
1573.679 advanced tech that the US has is you know the stealth the stealth jet um so
1580.159 you kind of got to think how about how those worlds are managed. on the public stage when it comes to conflict. If
1585.679 Russia did have some really advanced technology and it started using it over
1591.44 Ukraine and the world was to report on such technology being utilized, then
1597.52 obviously it puts the US in a really really bad situation with nothing to counter that technology. Well, wow.
1604.4 Russia is ahead of the US when it comes to technology. Now, Russia has a triangular craft that can kind of like
1609.76 hover on its own and generate its own power. It’s like this is crazy. Um how would the US react to that if that did
1616.0 come out? Well, the US if it did have such technology would have to show its own hand and say well actually we do
1621.679 have this technology and again that might might have its own impact. So we have to go down all these
1628.0 paths and I know it’s it’s horrible not knowing the answers. I really don’t like a lot of the um the open source
1634.159 intelligence accounts that think they do know the answers about where these things are coming from and they do know
1639.679 what they are. Like I’m happy to admit this is always all speculation on my part. I I really don’t have any good
1646.64 evidence to show where they’re coming from, but we can have a look at the patterns, can’t we, of behavior when it comes to these things. Um, and it all
1654.32 seems to have a lot in common. You know, they’re very, very brave in their behavior. They show their lights. They’re not able to be taken down. Can’t
1660.96 be tracked. We don’t know how they’re controlled. Um, it’s very, very bizarre.
1668.0 It’s a big payday coming for defense contractors. Chris, like you and Jeremy, I subscribe to all these defense
1674.08 newsletters uh about contracts and defense contractors and what they’re up to. And every single day there’s a new
1680.96 article about a big fat contract being given to somebody to develop a new system of anti- drone tech. There was
1687.44 something that was on it was on Twitter um a couple of days ago and it’s a giant cannon. It looks like a cannon that
1693.919 would be on the Death Star. Boom, boom, boom. shooting at the rebel uh uh craft and is supposedly capable of knocking
1700.399 down a dozen drones at a at a shot. Um I can’t wait till that gets out there and let’s see what it can do, you know. But
1706.72 it’s a big payday for big fat defense contractors as everything is
1712.559 I don’t know what the implications would be like what you said Chris if these are nuclearpowered um units that are out
1718.559 there. let’s just say from like a a normal um you know terrestrial you know
1724.08 country and we have these nuclearpowered drones like what is the implication of shooting them down? So all of a sudden you have like a some nuclear uh reactor
1732.559 that’s hit the ground. Do you think that’s part of the problem with why um things can’t just be shot at out the sky
1738.96 or potentially? potentially. Yeah, this is the this the this is the whole
1745.279 problem when it when it comes to this all these activities are clandestine and the US may be doing it um within Russia
1752.32 and China and then likewise um we may be doing it to them. Uh and and the trouble
1758.64 is with um Russian media and with Chinese media, you know, we’re dealing with authoritarian states. we may not
1764.48 perhaps hear about stories about incursions over their military bases as we do our military bases. So I I do I do
1773.6 think that is potentially one of the one of the the problems in terms of the um the nuclear
1780.48 the nuclear reactors and nuclear material kind of um causing a major incident. And you know I go back to the
1786.559 immaculate constellation document that was presented by Matthew Brown again.
1792.159 These things do seem to be rendeing with um with Russian I think a Chinese ship
1799.76 perhaps as well um within the Atlantic and the Pacific. And I have no reason to
1805.36 believe that’s not true. But again, you have to think, you know, um at the very least Russia and China um realize that
1812.48 this technology does exist. And I’d be very very surprised if the technology
1817.52 hasn’t been exploited in some way or another. Um, again, we’re dealing with
1823.12 um the classified world here, you know. um we’re having a unclassified
1828.88 conversation when it comes to this whole topic of these drones, but there’s also classified
1834.96 um conversations happening in skiffs as well um with people who read into um you
1842.24 know saps and caps and and that’s the really and we know
1847.6 how serious they treat the security when it comes to even having a conversation when it comes to classified materials
1853.679 and That’s that that’s the thing that I really really dislike most about this whole thing because I’m pretty sure that
1860.08 they know a lot more about the nature of these drones um than we do um within the
1867.279 intelligence world. Um I’ll just say this, Jeremy. I don’t
1872.96 know what the weaponized budget is like. I don’t you know I’ve had more than enough travel for to last me the rest of my life, but if we need to go to
1879.679 Copenhagen, I’m willing to go and spend some time on the ground there. and Sweden and Norway as well. I mean, I’ll
1886.32 make that sacrifice. Be awesome, man. You got a lot of fans in Denmark, by the
1891.919 way. I just want to mention it. I went to Copenhagen like two years ago. I mean, you’re both celebrities there, you
1898.48 know. I wouldn’t be surprised if they pay a mural of you both the buildings in
1903.6 I was there uh I was there some years ago at an invitation and just loved it. Just absolutely loved it. You got to
1909.12 watch out for the bicycle mafia when you’re walking down the street there in Copenhagen. But everything else was
1914.159 fabulous. So, yeah, willing to go. Yeah, a lot of people have been asking me
1919.2 lately like there’s some journalists looking into the UFO topic and um even some agency people, you know, just
1925.76 asking, do I believe that we have reverse engineered any of this technology? I I just curious, George,
1932.159 after all this time you’ve you’ve looked at this, I know we all hope that we have. Um, and I know a lot of the
1937.84 stories that you’ve broken, the indications are that we have reverse engineered some of this technology. But
1942.96 what if you bottomlined it, George, do you think we have any operational craft
1948.159 that that display this kind of technology? I really don’t know. I mean, I I don’t
1954.24 think it requires nonhuman intelligence to build the kind of drone things, UAS,
1959.44 UAV systems that we’re seeing. We just don’t know how they work right now out here in the unclassified world.
1965.679 I don’t think that requires alien tech to build something like that. But maybe, you know, maybe it is. I mean, I, you
1971.6 know, what we’ve all heard from our sources is that we haven’t made much progress in reverse engineering this
1977.279 stuff with the one exception of the Russians who had had some success with a
1982.88 beam weapon. I don’t think it’s operational. At least it wasn’t the last time I had heard. But they did do some
1988.399 testing on something that they got from a crash site. But I I have no indication
1993.6 that we’ve uh we’ve got a a sport model that we have built and are operating out
1999.039 there. Uh then again, we just heard a an amazing story in the previous episode of
2004.32 Weaponized of something at Eglund years ago that if it’s not ours, we’re
2009.44 certainly in league with it. It was sitting there and with all of our personnel, US personnel around it seemed to be some kind of a cooperation going
2016.64 on there. So, you know, I don’t know. George and Jeremy, would would we be correct in terms of reverse engineering
2022.88 and roles that each agency might have that it would be the DOE or Patel uh
2029.36 that would be in charge of kind of propulsion systems and power sources. So
2034.399 if something like that did something like that, if that had been reverse
2039.44 engineered, it wouldn’t necessarily come from the DoD. That would make sense. Sure.
2045.84 particular aspects of the technology that you just described, it would make sense to be in DOE. And also from a
2052.24 practical standpoint, it’s a lot harder to get information out of DOE, extra lay layers of secrecy even compared to DoD
2060.079 or DO now. Yeah. All these people that have come to us, it’s not like one person, it’s not
2066.399 like two people, it’s not like within the last, you know, couple months. This is for George like you know 40 years you
2072.079 know people have been coming to a journalist and saying we have craft of
2077.52 unknown origin technology of unknown origin and we are trying to reverse
2082.96 engineer that technology maybe it started for George with Lazar but you had Dr. Latsky come on our show and say
2089.76 that we breached a hole of a technology of unknown origin. No wings, no rotors, no tail, no fuel, no no even fuel that
2096.8 they could see. I don’t know how you’d reverse engineer that, but it’s not like one person that’s come forward. There are people that said these are from
2102.72 archaeological digs, at least some of the power sources, if not the full craft. You know, we we’d have to dismiss
2109.04 everybody that’s come, you know, to me and George, George for 40 years, to say, look, there there’s nothing to see here.
2115.599 Move on. I I I I buy it. I buy it that there is u a technology far more
2122.16 advanced that we didn’t make and that we’ve been trying. I I I buy it. I can’t prove it today. I definitively prove it
2129.28 today. It’s not really my job maybe, but um I can’t dismiss all the people that
2134.72 have come forward to us in different capacity to give us this base narrative, this base understanding. And I don’t
2141.119 think they were tricked. I don’t think that this is some big scop and everybody’s in on it except for me, me
2147.04 and George, and you. I don’t buy that. So I I don’t know what the truth is, but it’s got to be somewhere in the middle
2153.119 there. You know, Dr. Latsky is pretty well connected. He’s been at this a long time. He’s pretty deep on the inside. He
2159.92 shared like two sentences that he was cleared to say, « We’ve breached the hull. We’ve been inside. » That doesn’t
2166.24 ex exactly instill a lot of confidence that we figured out how it works. That we finally managed to get inside. Uh
2173.52 doesn’t sound like we’re flying it around to go to 7-Eleven to pick up a six-pack, you know. So,
2178.64 right. We’ll have to get him back here, Jeremy, pretty soon. I would love that. I would love that. He just wrote a new book, you you know,
2184.72 it’s a guy we squeeze him, maybe we’ll get more good information. I I It’d be great to have him on again.
2190.64 Yeah. Chris, thanks very much for your time. Anything else to add to this? I mean, you do still leave room in your
2197.359 conspiratorial scenario for good oldfashioned non-human intelligence stuff floating around out there, not
2203.599 just advanced craft that the Russians, Chinese, and you and Americans don’t want to tell the public about.
2209.76 Yeah. Yeah. Well, Marik from Ren Camp and I talk quite frequently about this and he’ll point to similar kind of um
2217.359 incursions over US Air Force bases going decades back I think 1960s 1970s um
2223.92 before you had this kind of drone technology that we do have now. So um I think that’s definitely worth noting and
2230.64 and I am aware of instance over New Jersey where it doesn’t seem to me like
2236.0 we are dealing with drones at all as well. So, I mean, we can’t always treat it as a black and white situation.
2242.16 Reality is much more nuanced with many layers. Um, and I’d also point out as
2247.92 well that I just find it very, very bizarre with To the Stars Academy, their
2253.119 whole big thing when they first came out was about actually um producing a kind
2259.119 of anti-gravity craft of their own. That that was the prime aspect about what they were all
2264.88 about. and you had Steve Justice, you had Chris Melon among many, many others who signed up to that and put their name
2270.56 behind TTSA. I’ve been trying to get in touch with TTSA to ask them about that. I’ve got no comment at all from them.
2277.359 So, I just think that’s very interesting. If the technology didn’t exist, why would someone like Steve Justice and all the others involved to
2283.839 the stars academy put their names behind that project if the technology didn’t exist? And if the technology did exist,
2290.0 why would you do so via Tom Dange and to the Stars Academy instead of classifying that text straight away and creating it
2296.8 under, you know, um, Loheed Martin buried under deep secrecy. I I don’t
2302.8 understand that either. Good point. All right, Chris Sharp, thanks very
2308.72 much. Please keep us in the loop. You’re on the cutting edge of that story there as always. Um, doing great work. Thank
2314.96 you. You know, it does get complicated, Jeremy, with the the big geopolitical picture, Russians, Chinese, US, and and
2322.8 it makes sense what Chris was saying about we may be doing the same thing to them, and nobody wants to admit it
2328.96 because it would lead to perhaps dire consequences, but you know, you and I
2334.24 hearken back to what had happened a year ago and some of the things that were underway, and it it’s scary uh some of
2340.56 the some of the incidents and reports that came our way. Correct. Yeah. So, two things Chris said that
2345.839 were interesting. One is what if they uh changed the return to sender to be back at the base, which is something that you
2352.079 do if something’s got a bomb on it. You do return to sender and it and it’s supposed to go back. It’s a very famous
2357.28 kind of hack you can do. But that’s a good point. What if you do return to sender and they they just change the
2363.04 metadata to make it look like it was the point of origin they wanted to bomb? So, there there’s some real issues and you
2369.44 and I talked about this way before the drone thing was even like a word. We said every UFO is going to be called a
2375.44 drone and and all the drones are going to be called UFOs for a while and it’s going to confuse everything. And we’re
2381.119 seeing that now. Um we’re absolutely seeing that now. But you and I would get reports that were substantial that were
2389.04 substantiated and were important that were so bizarre. So during that uh New
2394.64 Jersey drone stuff, there was a critical infrastructure facility, also an energy facility in that area. And we got word
2400.88 from reliable sources that there was footage of a pyramidshaped object
2406.72 lifting up out of the bay and hovering and loitering over this critical infrastructure. And indeed, there was an
2413.599 incursion and something was hovering over it. And we were told there was footage of it. So you and I asked the
2419.52 sources. We’re like, « Do you want to report this up because it’s not working for you right now reporting it up? There
2425.28 are people in the FBI that want to know and they’re like, « Absolutely. I I don’t want to break any rules, » they said, « but there’s footage of it. It’s sitting
2431.839 on this Honeywell server, and we I do want this is important. This is a
2437.599 defense. » And we we told the FBI, we told them, we connected them to exactly
2442.96 where it would be. And then before they could go look for that Honeywell footage, for the first time in history
2448.96 that this individual knew about it, that footage was gone. It was deleted off of the server. So you and I kind of learned
2455.68 real quick about those servers and how it works. But that is that is real. We reported that to the FBI because we were
2461.92 told that the individuals that were giving us that information wanted it reported. It was a pyramid-shaped object
2467.68 lifted out of the water. I mean, close camera proximity, by the way, not like a blurry image. and um and it was deleted.
2475.52 So I we don’t know who deleted it. We put it in the hands of an investigatory body that we were hoping would get to
2481.599 the bottom. Of course, they’re not going to tell us if they get to the bottom of it, but we were informed that the footage was deleted before arrival and
2488.079 not by the individual that informed us. So there’s so many questions, man, about this stuff, you know, UAP, UFO,
2495.52 um you know, drones. It it gets confusing even for me. I have fatigue with this but it gets confusing.
2502.16 But I do use a pyramid though. Not a not a triangle. Pyramid melt, doesn’t it?
2508.079 Well, triangular by angle of observation. Pyramidal in shape.
2514.72 Melt. All right. Well, a lot to chew on here. We’ve got some pretty cool stuff coming in the near future on weaponized.
2521.119 So, um, get some sleep and we’ll see you soon. Okay. Thanks, George.
2531.1 [Music]
.